Federal Report’s Scathing Critique of Prison System’s Treatment of Mentally Ill

The Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General recently released a report that heavily criticized the prison system’s treatment of mentally ill inmates.

There have been rumors circulating for years that prison systems from across the country were providing inadequate accommodations to mentally ill inmates. Other detractors argued that inmates were becoming more mentally ill due to the pressures of living behind bars and denied access to therapies and medications that might alleviate some of the mentally ill patients’ suffering.

The Department of Justice’s report, though, homed in on a prison in Pennsylvania for its analysis. The report noted the pending lawsuit against a Lewisburg prison and went on to claim that this prison had a number of lawsuits against it. The lawsuits were filed against the prison for the prison’s deficient mental health services.

The Department of Justice’s report also indicted the Bureau of Prisons more broadly by alleging that the Bureau of Prisons condoned the practice of keeping mentally ill inmates in solitary confinement for extended periods of time. This practice could be considered very detrimental to mentally ill inmates psychology well-being since keeping these kinds of inmates in solitary confinement has been shown to result in poorer mental-health outcomes over the long term.

The Bureau of Prisons was also called into question for the size of its solitary confinement cells. The Department of Justice considered these cells too small for housing inmates. Also at issue was the fact that many overcrowded prisons have resorted to cramming in multiple mentally ill inmates in the same small cell.

The issue of overcrowding is perhaps more pernicious since overcrowding has been associated with greater prison violence and even a greater number of prison deaths. The risks are that much higher with mentally ill inmates denied proper treatment or medication.

Agora Financial Providing Independent Finance Commentary

Agora Financial, LLC is a private publishing company that has been around for more than ten years. Agora Financial, LLC has been dedicated to helping their readers learn more about the integrity of their wealth and how to grow and protect it.

 

Over the course of its operation, Agora Financial has developed a number of services which range from free to paid subscriptions. The company offers newsletters, physical books and e-books, as well as other online publications in the forms of papers and articles. What is more, Agora Financial, LLC also offers seminars and documentary films that analyze events and teach about the benefits and disadvantages of all things that concern wealth and its growth and protection. U to date, Agora Financial, LLC has more than a million readers. The primary focus of Agora Financial is to give a unique perspective on effectively managing your money as well as growing your wealth.

 

Up to date, Agora Financial offers about twenty publications. They are designed to help readers navigate through the many different areas of the market. Topics include finding promising businesses that have a bright future ahead of them, secrets of generating income, as well as strategies for wealth protection, to name a few. As a whole, Agora Financial, LLC makes sure to educate their readers on all things finance. The company is focused on preparing readers of all ages for any financial stages of their lives. Agora Financial also aims to make sure that their readers will be able to protect themselves and their financial stability should a financial meltdown occur.

 

Agora Financial, LLC provides research that is independent which means that the company does not accept money from other firms in exchange for any media or content coverage. The analysists travel on site to collect data and investigate opportunities personally.

How The Law Profession Is Changing

The profession of law is changing rapidly. There are all kinds of things happening and those who practice law or are interested in doing so should take note.

The Field Is Growing

These days it seems like just about everyone wants to get into the field of law. They know that it can be a lucrative thing to do even if they have to spend a good deal of money just to get their law degree. It is something that is worth it to a lot of people. This pans out in the increasing number of people who claim law as their profession in the United States. The number of lawyers is over 1 million as far back as the year 2000 and that number is still growing according to dcbar.org.

More Business Oriented

In decades past one who practiced law believed that they were professionals. They had people come to them for their legal advice and help. While that still happens, more lawyers these days view themselves as captains of their own business. They have to go out and seek the clients that they need to keep the business running.

Referrals are still a big part of the business without a doubt, but advertising via billboards and social media are an increasing part of what lawyers do. They focus on bringing in new clients all the time. They have to focus on this type of marketing in order to fend off the other lawyers that are also trying to generate new business.

These are just two of the big changes that are coming to the legal practice. There are many other things going on as well, but these two changes have had a huge impact on the way that the field is moving. It is worth keeping an eye on how this will continue to go.

BRUNO FAGALI’S CAREER LIFE

     Bruno Jorge Fagali is a Brazilian lawyer as well as the founder of Fagali Law Firm. Bruno is known for his integrity considering the various corruption cases he has handled in Brazil. He has initiated many actions with an effort to clean up the system especially in dealing with public funds.

As an experienced attorney, Bruno specializes in public and anti corruption law, administrative law, urban law, compliance, regulatory law, and ethics. Some of the commendable achievements that have put him in the limelight include helping the corporates initiate a drive aimed at bringing transparency at the organization level through training.

His law firm focuses on public law, compliance, election and anti corruption. The four are considered to be the pillars of social equality. Apart from that, Fagali works with Nova/sb which is a prominent advertising agency in Brazil and is his corporate manager. Bruno also helped the firm create an ethics committee and also initiated uniform treatment for all their employees.

Like any other prominent attorney, Bruno began small. Having completed his undergraduate degree in administrative law from the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP in 2009, he later proceeded to do his masters in State law at the University of Sao Paulo. He then worked as an intern in several law firms before beginning his career life as an attorney. He worked in Radi, Calil and Associados advocacia as an attorney before establishing his law firm.

Bruno Fagali is also a member of the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics as well as an Effective Associate Brazilian Institute of Law and Corporate Ethics. Bruno is also multilingual with the ability to speak four languages; English, French, Spanish and Portuguese. It is Bruno’s experience and love for integrity that has gained him respect in Brazil.

For more, please visit http://www.consultasocio.com/q/sa/bruno-jorge-fagali.

Lost Paperwork Might Erase Billions in Private Student Loans

Lost Paperwork Might Erase Billions in Private Student Loans

The National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts holds student loans for several thousand people of people. As countless court cases appealing defaults on student loans throughout the nation have shown, the private loan company has failed to produce the proper paperwork. “Judges have already dismissed dozens of lawsuits against former students,” the New York Times DealBook blog reported, saying that judges were “essentially wiping out their debt, because documents proving who owns the loans are missing.”
Many of these cases come from the sub-prime mortgage crisis of the last decade. During the crisis, billions of dollars of loans were erased by courts due to improper paperwork. Given the lax standards of the time, many banks gave equally unstable private student loans. This includes the National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts.
Now that many are recognizing these paperwork problems, the National Collegiate may have an insurrection on their hands. When people realize that the company filed improper paperwork, they may default on their loans, rather than continue payments.
As one of their lawyers pointed out: “As news of the servicing issues and the trusts’ inability to produce the documents needed to foreclose on loans spreads,” said the lawyer, “the likelihood of more defaults rises.” The loans total at least five billion dollars, and have come to media attention after a number of creditors pursued legal action against student borrowers after they defaulted on their loans. To their surprise, they were unable to produce proof of loan ownership in court, causing judges to dismiss the claims. The New York Times reviewed a number of cases, stating: “many other collection cases are deeply flawed.” It reported these flaws include: “incomplete ownership records and mass-produced documentation.”
The National Collegiate serves as an umbrella for twelve different trusts who control over 800,000 student loans. According to court findings, student borrowers have defaulted on a total of five billion dollars worth of that debt so far.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions Wants Police To Seize People’s Personal Assets

Jeff Sessions, the former Senator from Alabama, has always been a controversial figure. Sessions is against gay rights, using marijuana, and being politically honest. Now that Sessions is Attorney General of the United States, he is in a position to upset the budding cannabis industry. He wants to change some of the policies that the former Attorney General, Eric Holder put in place. Some Washington insiders say Sessions has an Edgar Hoover type mindset, and he can create serious legal issues for Americans.

Recently, Sessions was a speaker at the National District Attorneys Association meeting. Jeff didn’t waste any time telling those legal watchdogs and prosecutors he will enforce the asset forfeiture program that was put on hold by his predecessor. Sessions main target is drug dealers, but anyone could be the victim of this violation of civil rights, according to lawyers who understand the forfeiture policy. Sessions also want to reverse an Obama administration order that stops local officials from using the federal system to get around state laws. Former Attorney Eric Holder said Sessions is an extremist, and Wisconsin Representative Jim Sensenbrenner thinks Sessions forfeiture program is wrong and unconstitutional.

Senator Rand Paul thinks Sessions is opening the door for an extraordinary amount of lawsuits because the government is taking property away from people that have not had their day in court. Paul thinks assuming someone is guilty and taking their property away is a crazy and illegal idea. But in a civil forfeiture case, the police and prosecutors don’t have to prove guilt in order to take assets away. In a criminal forfeiture, authorities have to file charges, prove guilt, and get a conviction.

Sessions wants to stop drug traffickers, but he also wants to take down the legal sale of marijuana in the states that sell it for medical purposes. California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa wants to regulate asset forfeiture, and he is sponsoring legislation to do that. Issa thinks Sessions is going backward instead of forward if he gets his way. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas also thinks civil asset forfeiture is a bad idea. Justice Thomas thinks asset forfeiture is an egregious act, and it opens the door for people who abuse the intent of the program. Sessions may be one of those people, according to his opponents. Jeff Sessions is an old school politician who is out of touch and out of date, according to those opponents.

Changes To Michigan Law May Be Unconstitutional Says New Lawsuit

A new lawsuit from Oakland County in Michigan has alleged that recent changes to the state law may be unconstitutional. The law was originally voted through in 2013, but it has not yet been implemented. It is set to go into effect in November, but this lawsuit seeks a stay on that implementation.

The name of the law is the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission Act. They contest that the law takes away the constitutional authority of the Michigan Supreme Court’s authority to set the rules that govern law in the state of Michigan.

Attorneys for Oakland County state that they do not want to take away the ability for the indigent to have access to an attorney. They say that they just want to make sure that any changes to the law are constitutional. A spokesperson for the Attorney General in the state of Michigan has declined to give a comment on this case. She does not want to address something that has to work its way through the courts. It is the tradition of the government to not make statements about litigation that is still pending.

Detroit News says that the lawsuit intends to take aim at the idea that the state government must reimburse local governments when new state regulations come into play. This is written into the law because it is believed that it would not be fair for the local governments to take on too much of the burden of new regulations.

Oakland County has a budget of just $3 million for indigent defense and would like to be reimbursed to a greater extent for the new changes to the law. There is not yet a date set for the court to hear the case. This is something that will be an interesting test case in the courts.

Legal Challenges

The field of law is changing rapidly in the United States today. This was one of the most popular fields for college graduates to enter at one time. However, this is now a field that is saturated with college graduates. A lot of students are graduating from law school with record levels of debt. Not only that, but they are having trouble finding a quality job to help pay the bills.

In the coming years, many people expect that the legal field is going to continue to go through various changes. With that being said, students need to be prepared to innovate through their career.

Online Services

One of the newest trends in the legal field today is offering online services for people who need legal help. A lot of people today struggle with finding affordable legal help in their area.

Online legal advice is a viable option for people who need a quick question answered. Not only does it cost much less time than going in and seeing a lawyer, but it saves lawyers time as well. Over time, a lot of people have had success getting their question answered in a short period of time. New graduates need to look at all possibilities when it comes to enhancing their legal career.

New Legislation

Another important trend in the legal industry is the new legislation being introduced in several states across the country. Many people today believe that online gambling should be legal. Now is a great time to start enacting legislation in various states.

As a legal student, this is an exciting time to live in for many people. There are a lot of people who want to see things enacted that have been illegal in the past. Many people today are still entering the profession because they want to help others.

Things That Are Impacting The Field Of Law Today

There are plenty of factors shaping all kinds of industries at any given moment. The field of law is not exempt from all of these changes. We take a look at a few of these today.

Electronic Discovery

What evidence is admissible in court is something that frustrates many people bringing lawsuits or battling criminal cases. Depending on the circumstances and what side of the case one is on, it can be frustrating to either side. That being said, new changes are coming to what may be admissible. Electronic discovery is now a thing being considered by a lot of courts.

Electronic discovery is basically the idea that things such as e-mails, voicemails, and the like something that may be brought into court. That is evidence that can break a case wide open and make or break it. Lawyers on both sides of any case will need to consider this change.

Marketing Via Social Media

The Balance has an article out which says that more lawyers than ever are using social media to market themselves and their services. It used to be considered unprofessional to do this, but that is no longer the case. It is too difficult to ignore the number of people on social media and the marketing potential that is available there. These days lawyers are happy to open a social media page for their practice.

Longer Hours And More Clients

Lawyers already have a busy life, but it is about to get even busier. The number of hours that lawyers are putting into their job is on the increase. They are taking on more clients and battling each other even more heavily for that business. If you are a lawyer, you can expect to burn the midnight oil more often, but that is good news for the profession.

Larkin & Lacey

ACLU

The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 by those seeking to protect the constitutional rights of Americans. The organization was founded during a time when a wide range of civil rights abuses were going on in the United States.

People were getting locked up for distributing anti-war literature. The right of free speech was being impeded upon by and not being protected. Women were still behind in rights. Racial minorities were being discriminated against.

When the ACLU was first founded, it consisted of a bunch of civil libertarians whose number could only fill up a room. Today, there are about a million members, and the ACLU spans throughout the United States of America. There are affiliate offices in every state in America.

They file cases in the federal and state governments. The only other organization that appears before the Supreme Court more than the ACLU is the Department of Justice.

The ACLU has defended various individuals and organizations with more unpopular or politically incorrect views. Prime examples of this include organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan and Nation of Islam. The ACLU may not agree with the views of all of it’s clients, though they defend people with controversial views in order to uphold the idea that they are fighting for people’s constitutional rights. That believe that nobody’s constitutional rights should be impeded upon.

Lacey & Larkin Frontera Fund

In October of 2007, Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin went through a heart-pounding experience. They were stolen from their homes by people who came out of vans with Mexican license plates and tinted out windows.

Soon, Larkin and Lacey found out that they were being carted off to two separated jails. They were being wrongly arrested, and the local government was not going through the correct procedures to jail them.

There were no real legal grounds to jail them. After a number of hours, Lacey and Larkin left jail, and soon pursued a legal battled that would be resolved in 2013 with a lofty settlement $3.7 million being given to them by Maricopa County.

The reason why they were being arrested was because they had exposed the corruption and discrimination of the local government by writing about it in their publication, The Phoenix New Times.

The local government was irritated by what they wrote, so Larkin and Lacey were given subpoenas to give personal information about every single reader, writer and editor of the publication.

The subpoena even requested that the search histories and IP addresses of the publication’s readers be given, as well, which seemed to be suspiciously invasive. Larkin and Lacey published information about this, and were immediately arrested.

Putting their settlement money to a good cause, Larking and Lacey established the Lacey & Larkin Frontera Fund. The Frontera Fund is located in Arizona, and focuses on issues that especially affect people there.

A focus is put on immigrants and Hispanics; which makes sense because much of Arizona’s population is Hispanic and the state is located at the border, where immigrants cross over.

Read more: Michael Larcey | Facebook and Michael Larcey | Twitter