5 Things You Will Absolutely Love About The Organo Gold Opportunity

Are you looking for a world class business that can help you take your health and life to a whole new level? If so the Organo Gold opportunity may be just what you are looking for.

Here are 5 things you will absolutely love about the Organo Gold opportunity:

They Have a Global Support Team

Right now Organo Gold is operating in 50 different countries throughout the world. To help ensure all distributors have every possible chance at success, the company offers a global support team, regional leadership, and management teams that are dedicated to each individual country. Organo Gold is available on eBay.

They Offer a Very Generous Compensation Plan

Not only is the compensation plan generous, but it is also innovative and transparent. With Organo Gold you will be able to make money 7 different ways. Very few companies in the industry can compete with this level of compensation.

They Offer Exclusive Premium Products

As a distributor you will have access to exclusive products that can’t be found anywhere else. All Organo Gold products are made using the highest quality premium ingredients. The company utilizes a very strict quality control process to ensure every product is fresh and safe to consume.

They Offer World Class Training

Organo Gold wants all of its distributors to be successful. They therefore offer world class training that is based on the principles found in the best selling book Think and Grow Rich by Napolean Hill.

As a distributor you will have access to online business building tools, weekly conference calls and leadership programs in your regional field. Follow Organo Gold on facebook.com.

They Give Back

The great thing about Organo Gold is their commitment to giving back. Their foundation, OG Cares, is a global non profit that helps foster positive change by providing leadership development opportunities for children all over the world.

Read: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ogx-body-management-line-adds-fenix-xt-and-fenix-dx-300528649.html

Judge Rules On Trump’s CFPB Pick

In recent legal news, a judge in Washington has given a victory to President Donald Trump. After the resignation of the previous director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, President Donald Trump appointed Mick Mulvaney as the new director. However, the deputy director, Leandra English, filed a lawsuit in order to get a restraining order to prevent Mick Mulvaney from taking charge of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Leandra English claimed that she was the rightful director and that she should have taken over after the previous director resigned.


Judge Timothy Kelly refused the restraining order on Tuesday morning. He said that there is a very small likelihood that the case would be able to proceed based on its merits. Leandra English argued that the Dodd-Frank Act made her the rightful director. However, Judge Timothy Kelly said that the Federal Vacancies Reform Act seems to apply to this situation. The Federal Vacancies Reform Act would give President Donald Trump the ability to appoint a new director for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.


Mick Mulvaney is the head of the Office of Management and Budgets. However, Judge Kelly said that there is nothing that would prevent him from heading both departments. In addition, he added that denying Donald Trump the ability to appoint Mick Mulvaney as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau would raise significant constitutional issues.


The Dodd-Frank Act says that the deputy shall serve as acting director in the absence or unavailability of the director. However, the Department of Justice said that the Dodd-Frank Act does not replace the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, which gives the president the ability to temporarily appoint a director of an agency that is subject to Senate confirmation. In other words, either one of those acts can be invoked. Leandrea English is considering her steps and may seek an injunction against the ruling.

David Giertz Explains how Social Security Beneficiaries Lose 25 Percent of Finances

Many social security beneficiaries in the United States make gross mistakes that reduce their benefits by 25 percent, says David Giertz, the Nationwide Financial Distributors’ president of distribution and sales. Giertz explains that if a retiree whose full age of retirement is 66 years chooses to get the social security check at 62 years, the award will decline by 25 percent or from $1,000 to $750 monthly payments.

David Giertz laments about the lack of knowledge to maximize social security payouts among many U.S. citizens. “Millions of parents and grandparents dry up and go away even if they have retirement income plans,” remarks David.

Maximizing Social Security Payouts

What makes U.S. retirees lose out on social security awards?

The Nationwide Retirement Institute carried out a study on social security fund subscribers. The survey established that although many citizens understand there is a reduction of benefits for clients who get checks before the full maturity period, the beneficiaries do not know the reduction percentage. Neither is the Social Security Fund membership aware that the lower monthly payout is long-term, not a one-time reduction.

30 percent of retirees receive less than the expected benefits. “A significant part of the U.S. population assume that because it is possible to start receiving Social Security at age 62, it is necessary to apply for the benefits,” explains David Giertz. It is “a land grab belief.”

To David Giertz, whose experience in the progressive financial industry spans over 30 years, educating the people registered in Social Security can help. Giertz’s fame rests on the consistent leveraging innovation, business strategy, processes to achieve profitable growth. The former President of sales and distribution at Nationwide Financial helped to deliver profitable revenue from 11B to $17.8B.

David is superb in the management, strategizing, and distribution of life insurance, annuities, specialty markets, private-sector retirement plans, and bank-aided mutual funds. At Financial Institutions Bank, Giertz improved revenue from $1.5B to $8B in 2009.

Are More People Representing Themselves in Court?

Nowadays, it seems like more and more people are going to court for a variety of different reasons. Unfortunately, hiring a lawyer can be incredibly expensive, especially if your case is larger and needs additional visits to the courtroom. If this has been a problem for you, you might find it incredibly beneficial to know that most people are now representing themselves in court. Not only does this save them a ton of money and prevents their settlement from being divided into lawyer fees, but it also saves hassle and time for you as well.

The key to representing yourself in court is knowing what to do. There are a lot of people who actually make things worse because they do not know what to do in terms of representing themselves. You need to know a bit about law in order to make this work in your favor. You also need to have enough witnesses to help your case when you are in front of the judge. This is going to encourage the entire case to go as well as possible, and it prevents problems down the road because of the fact that you’ve decided to do this on your own.

The most important thing to keep in mind is that there are a lot of people representing themselves each and every day. There is nothing worse than finding that this is something that hinders your ability to win the case. Because of this, it is so important that you file the case in advance to when it is actually going to happen. There is nothing worse than not being able to go to court because you cannot afford to hire a lawyer who is going to be able to help you and represent you in court. This is why you need to make sure that this is important for when you’re looking to get the most out of the case and know that this will help.

Chicago to Create New Affirmative Litigation Team

Chicago will be creating a new affirmative litigation team that will consist of four lawyers. This team will make sure that businesses and corporations in Chicago are being held to the task and keeping in line with the law. If a business is doing something that is wrong, these lawyers will file litigation against them. They will use local and outside counsel as needed.

The team has not yet been created. However, Chicago has already filed suit against Uber and Equifax, alleging that they did not respond quickly enough to data breaches, which affected many residents in Chicago. In addition, Chicago has vowed to sue US Steel for waste that has been dumped in rivers near Chicago.

Chicago announced that they are creating this team in order to fill a void that was created by the federal government’s lack of motivation to keep these companies in check. In addition, this team will help bring in revenue to Chicago through these lawsuits.

Siskel, who is the corporation counsel in Chicago, said that this idea started taking place well before the previous election, based on candidate Trump’s comments during his campaign. It made him believe that he will not be as strong as he could on corporations, which meant that Chicago may need to step in to do it themselves.

Siskel was appointed as corporation counsel in Chicago a few weeks after the 2016 election. His first moves were to build better bridges between law enforcement, the judiciary, and other players in the city.

Siskel has also been making it his priority to make various reforms to the city’s legal system and law enforcement system. He will also fix issues with the city’s record keeping process.

This new team will include two lawyers who have already been appointed and another two lawyers who have not yet been appointed. The salary for these two lawyers will be between $65,000 and $115,000 a year.

What Legal Actions Awat Harvey Weinstein?

Movie mogul Harvey Harvey Weinstein’s is having a rough time. More than fifty women (and some men) have come forward claiming that the film maker has sexually harassed them at different times over a long period of time.

The picture that is emerging is that of a powerful and influential figure in the film industry using his position for undignified gains. On the other hand, Weinstein has acknowledged that has “caused a lot of pain,” yet still claiming that some of the allegations are “patently false.”

But it is the legal implications of the long list of allegations that is likely to cause even more drama. Employment and labour law attorney Ann Fromholz said that regardless of Weinstein’s influences and his position at the company, The Weinstein Co. would be liable over sexual harassment claims even if they weren’t aware.

The four member board of the company had indicated that their commitment to participating in any investigations. “We are committed to assisting with our full energies in all criminal or other investigations of these alleged acts, while pursuing justice for the victims and a full and independent investigation of our own.” Read, a statement from the board.

Several board members resigned in the wake of the allegations. Details of whether the company or Weinstein had made any payments have not been substantiated.

Top celebrities, including award winning actress Angelina Jolie, Ashley Judd,Gwyweth Paltrow among others have given grotesque accounts of their encounter with Weinstein at different times in their career. Actress Rose McGowan is reported to have reached a $100 000 settlement with Weinstein to “avoid litigation and buy peace,” after an ugly encounter with the film mogul in a hotel room during the Sundance Film Festival in 1997.

The allegations on Harvey Weinstein have cast a pale shadow on work ethics in Hollywood. Focus now shifts to whether there will be lawsuits emerging from the Weinsten scandal even as Weinstein reportedly takes time for counseling and to concentrate on his family.

Talk Fusion is Expanding Their Company into New Delhi India

Talk Fusion is a company that is going above and beyond to better lives in countries around the world. Their latest announcement was on November 29th when they informed the world via press release that they would be opening a new international office. The location of the new office in New Delhi India is absolutely perfect. This new location is designed to serve as a central international support center to support the company’s continued growth in the region.


This announcement has many people throughout India very excited as they are eagerly awaiting the opportunity to take part in Talk Fusion Instant Pay. Talk Fusion Instant Pay is believed to be the world’s very first instantaneous compensation plan that allows representatives of the company to receive pay within 3 minutes after a sale is finalized.


The founder of Talk Fusion Bob Reina believes that India will become one of the top Talk Fusion marketplaces in the world so the placement of the office in New Dehli could not be a better fit. The new office will be located in the Westend Mall in Unit 301 B located in New Delhi in the Janak Puri West Metro Station. The office hours of this new location will be Monday through Saturday from 9:30 am until 6 pm local time.


Talk Fusion provides innovated products and services to businesses in over 140 countries worldwide. Their most familiar product is the Talk Fusion Video Suite which includes video email, video newsletters, live meetings, video chat, and sign-up forms all in one convenient package! To learn more check out the full press release here or visit the Talk Fusion website at talkfusion.com.



Learn more: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/talk-fusion

Wells Fargo Faces Will Spend Billions in Legal Fees

Banking giant Wells Fargo is making shareholders and investors very nervous as its legal bills keep getting more and more exorbitant. The American bank is keeping law firms quite busy as it faces multiple legal challenges ranging from consumer fraud to improper mortgage lending practices, and the total cost of legal representation, settlements, court fees and fines could total more than $3.3 billion.


In a recent financial filing reported by Bloomberg, Wells Fargo indicated that it allocated $1 billion more than the previous quarter to its legal defense fund. The bank’s Chief Financial Officer has hinted that Wells Fargo will likely settle with financial regulators and aggrieved mortgage borrowers in the next few months, but there have been no indications of how much the settlement amounts may be. The bank needs to make strong investments in legal operations now for the purpose of keeping settlements as low as possible; this is a case in which a single legal misstep could put the bank out of business.


In July 2017, Wells Fargo estimated that it would have to pay $80 million to aggrieved account holders who were charged for auto insurance coverage that they never requested; in the financial world, this unethical practice is known as “slamming.” A November filing by Wells Fargo indicates that the bank underestimated this loss considerably since it will now have to pay $150 million; in general, each financial report issued by the bank this year has seen an increase of legal fees, a situation that shareholders are not happy with.


An interesting aspect of the various cases Wells Fargo is currently facing is that former executives and directors are being held personally accountable. Whereas in the past a simple dismissal of executive board members was the typical corporate reaction to major scandals, a federal district judge in San Francisco overseeing the Wells Fargo case recently determined that claims against former bank directors should face legal scrutiny in certain circumstances.

Artificial Intelligence Program Wins Competition Against Lawyers

In late October, a legal skills competition between more than 100 attorneys and an artificial intelligence construct unfolded in London. More than 100 attorneys faced off against Case Cruncher Alpha, an AI construct developed and configured by Cambridge University students who initially set out to create a chatbot that can answer questions about legal topics.


According to a BBC news broadcast, the current version of Case Cruncher Alpha follows a structure that enables it to connect to a neural network and several databases. When the AI software was tasked to review 800 historic court cases involving payment protection insurance claims, it was able to accurately determine the outcome with a margin of 87 percent. The attorneys who entered the competition had less impressive results as their determination was correct by a margin of less than 62 percent.


It should be noted that the AI software had certain advantages in the competition. First of all, the lawyers were selected from various London firms, some of them quite prestigious, but they did not specialize in the type of insurance claims that they were tasked with reviewing; second, the AI was connected to several legal databases that the lawyers did not have access to when they reviewed the 800 cases.


The developers of Case Cruncher Alpha admit aware of the unfair advantage, and they admit that an experienced lawyer who specializes in payment protection insurance claims would perform better; nonetheless, the AI program took substantially less time to review a heavy caseload that required more than 100 attorneys to complete.


In the legal field, this competition seemed like the historic chess match series between IBM’s Big Blue supercomputer and Gary Kasparov in the 1990s. More recently, Google developed AlphaGo, an AI construct that beat a South Korean master in the ancient Chinese game of go, which is harder for a computer to master since playing often requires irrational strategies.


Legal experts who observed the competition stated that they think AI software may eliminate five percent of the attorney workforce in the near future.

Equifax Defends Legality of Executive Stock Sales

This summer’s hack of Equifax’s customer data has left nearly 150 million Americans in question of whether or not their data was included in the breach. The attack, which began in May and wasn’t caught until July, was further punctuated by a malware incident involving the company’s website in the following October, resulting in the suspension of a deal with the IRS. While the company will inevitably face legal repercussions, whether in the form of Justice Department action or through suits from individual customers, a recent internal inquiry has allegedly cleared members of the company from wrongdoing in at least one aspect of the case.


In the immediate days following the Equifax breach, it was reported that a group of several key executives sold off a large quantity of shares. With a value approaching $2 million, the sale of these shares was immediately the target of a probe led by the the Securities and Exchange Commission and Georgia’s U.S. Attorney’s Office. Equifax first became aware of the hack on July 29th, with the four executives in question jettisoning their stocks the following first week of August.


Given the timeline, it seemed more than likely that the sellers had been made aware of the hack, thereby making this an example of insider trading. However, Equifax maintained that Douglas Brandberg, an investor relations lead, Joseph Loughran, president of information solutions, John Gamble, the CFO, and Rodolfo Ploder, the president in charge of workforce solutions, were not among whose who had knowledge of the attack before its public announcement.


Equifax led its own internal investigation, which this week revealed its determination that the trade did not break any legal bounds. The investigative teamed performed well over 30 interviews and sifted through roughly 55,000 emails but found no evidence that the four executives in question had advanced knowledge, and likewise determined that the sales were approved following the necessary legal procedures. That said, it’s unclear if or how this internal investigation will affect legal proceedings from U.S. officials.